Saturday, July 4, 2009 19:41 MDT
Idaho Business Review
subscribeSUBSCRIBE

subscribeWANT THREE FREE ISSUES?
Daily EmailDaily e-mail updates
Real Estate EmailReal Estate e-mail updates
ADVERTISING? | CLASSIFIEDS | GOT A TIP? | TOP LIST | EVENTS | HOME RSS 2.0 CONTACT US at 208.336.3768
SEARCH ARCHIVES
See stories on: Idaho Companies Idaho Industries Idaho People

Newspaper Story

Industry leaders agree Idaho’s tech economy uncertain

POSTED: Monday, April 21, 2008

by Eddie Kovsky

Article Tools
Printer friendly edition Printer-friendly
E-mail this to a friend E-mail this
RSS Feed RSS feed
Digg this story Digg It!
Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us
Add to Facebook
Add to Twitter

A half a dozen of the state’s technology leaders met for breakfast last week to tackle the same problem that’s been plaguing Idaho’s technology sector for nearly a decade: What can the industry do to sustain its growth?
 
There were no clear solutions presented during a 90-minute discussion, only a clear framing of the problems facing the state’s technology businesses.
The event was hosted by the law firm of Holland and Hart, and co-sponsored by the Idaho Business Review.
Idaho has attracted many entrepreneurs, but their efforts are not enough to sustain the state’s technology sector or attract new companies. Business owners are too busy running their own companies to get involved in steering policy.
Participants agreed the state government needs to play a bigger role in marketing the business environment and developing the university system – not only to help develop technology, but to ensure that economic segment continues to generate tax revenue.
No one should assume the technology sector is here to stay, said Jason Crawforth, the former CEO of Treetop Technology.
“We were lucky to have a vibrant economy during the dot com era,” he said. “We’re starting to see what happens when you don’t pay attention to the largest sector. The only entity responsible for promoting the state is the state. I believe it’s the government’s role to take at least a passive attempt to invest in the economy.”
John Hale, a managing partner at KPMG and discussion moderator, said, “The state of Idaho leads the country in restraint in spending,”
A representative from the state Department of Commerce was invited to participate, but did not attend.
A lot of people come to Boise because it’s a great town, but have no idea what kind of place it is to do business, Balihoo CEO Pete Gombert said.
“I’ve been coaching our people at Balihoo about what it’s like to have an entrepreneurial environment,” he said. “I’ve just sent some of my mangers to Palo Alto to sit in coffee shops and see what it’s like. Everybody thinks we have a budding entrepreneurial community, but it lacks a lot of the energy.”  
Keynetics CEO Brad Wiskirchen agreed – Boise isn’t Palo Alto.
“I’ve had the opportunity to spend a lot of time in Palo Alto in the last year or so,” he said. “It’s a different environment there. We tell ourselves we’re a tech centered community. We’re not as tech centered as we think we are. All the high rankings in Forbes and Money won’t make it so. We have to build it.”
“I moved from tech into real estate just in time to see the market decline,” Kickstand President Chris Volk said. “I think there’s been a pervasive fear that the local economy is supported by people building houses for people who are building houses for people who keep coming to Idaho.”
Entrepreneurs can be successful anywhere, which means they don’t have to continue starting businesses in Idaho.
If you believe in your business concept, nothing is going to get in the way of executing it, Gombert said.
“I’m not going to look to the state to provide the resources or environment to start my business,” he said. “The one thing the state can do well is investment in primary and secondary education.”  
The universities are also a source of entrepreneurial activity, but again fall under the responsibility of the state.
If you go back far enough all successful tech regions are centered on universities, Wiskirchen said.
“The technologies that created Silicon Valley were incubated at universities,” he said. “We don’t have that same environment here for a number of reasons. We don’t have a tech transfer program. You have to start at the university level.”  
John Gardner, associate vice president of Energy Research, Policy and Sustainability at Boise State University, agreed.
“I agree it’s not there yet,” he said. “Every tech transfer is a new adventure for us. But we are going in the right direction.”
Gombert said Boise State’s engineering program, which is now in its tenth year, is headed in the right direction.
“When I started 10 years ago I didn’t hire a single person from Boise State,” he said. “Now I have eight, including a professor. I think it’s just nascent right now.”  
One way or another, all the stakeholders will need to get on the same page.
“If the goal is to attract larger tech companies to the valley, until we go out on with a united front and talk about strengths and weaknesses, we’re not going to get there,” Wiskirchen said. “The Boise Valley Economic Partnership must be paying people off for these high rankings. But until we get coordinated we’re never going to be able to sell people on Boise and back it up.”
Paul Hiller, executive director of the Boise Valley Economic Partnership, was scheduled to participate in the discussion but did not attend.

2 Comments

  1. Despite the mostly negative tone of this article there are lots of very positive things happening in the Treasure Valley. An Idaho company was just selected as one of Boeing's top suppliers, CradlePoint acquired by Sierra, more companies raising more money in the last year than any previous year -just to start. Do we have everything we need? No. The comments by the panel members are somewhat uninformed. Most of the new jobs in any area come from existing and new businesses within the area NOT from recruitment. There is growing evidence that a number of the new innovation/tech areas in the country are being created and growing in areas without the GRAND university. As for the entrepreneurial environment - is Boise Palo Alto? No, do we want it to be Palo Alto? I am not so sure. As I look at the progress we have made in the last few years the ecosystem as improved immensely. Do we have everything we need? No!!! I would ask each of those panelists what exactly have they done to improve that situation in the last day, week, month? Several months ago I suggested more doing and less talking was the path to moving Idaho ahead economically. Strategic doing should be everybody's mantra. Join others in this effort and stop hoping the state will do anything.

    Comment By ricky
    Monday, April 21, 2008 @ 6:55 PM

  2. I am President & COO of an industry-leading software company located in Hailey, ID. We have been here for 10 years when our founder fled from silicon valley to place his company where work-ethic was high and people could combine the rare balance of having a good vocation in their preferred location.

    The challenges are even more complicated to recruit businesses in this resort location, but we have thrived through innovation. SEIDO and the local Chambers have made concerted efforts to recruit businesses to this valley, especially focusing on high-tech, but to no avail.

    Our company was just purchased by our largest competitor and the value Idaho provides with highly educated and competent leaders and staff convinced our buyers to make this our HQ with management oversight over 4 other divisions located out-of-state. We hire talent.....not necessarily experience and Idaho has some great talent that can be trained effectively. The State and Federal governments are not going to help me grow or even make it easy to do business here, but we are dedicated to run our business where we can obtain the best talent. I also ran 3 businesses in Boise before taking this position 5 years ago and we produced the best performance metrics and financial results in each company's history. Idaho is a target rich environment for businesses to cultivate superior leaders and staff. The draw for new high-tech businesses should be the value of labor. Just my two cents.

    Comment By Gary Coats
    Thursday, April 24, 2008 @ 9:59 AM

Leave a comment
Leave this field empty

Name:

Email:


You have characters left.

Commenters, let's maintain a civil discussion here. Please observe the following guidelines:

  1. Do not use profanity or euphemisms for profanity.
  2. Do not personally attack or bait other commenters.
  3. Express your own views; don't just argue for argument's sake.
  4. Sarcasm doesn't work on the Web. Either avoid it or clearly label it so you aren't misinterpreted.
  5. Don't make the same point repetitively.
  6. No spam. Link to a commercial site only if it's relevant to the discussion.
  7. Putting your name on your comments increases their value and credibility. However, if you must conceal your identity, please choose one pseudonym and stick to it. No "sock puppets."