Wednesday, May 14, 2008 07:04 MDT
Idaho Business Review
subscribeWANT THREE FREE ISSUES?
Daily EmailDaily e-mail updates
ADVERTISING? | CLASSIFIEDS | GOT A TIP? | TOP LIST | RETURN TO HOME RSS 2.0 CONTACT US at 208.336.3768
SEARCH ARCHIVES
See stories on: Idaho Companies Idaho Industries Idaho People

Blog

Rambus case ends badly for Micron

POSTED: 15:33 MDT Wednesday, March 26, 2008

by Eddie Kovsky

Article Tools
Printer friendly edition Printer-friendly
E-mail this to a friend E-mail this
RSS Feed RSS feed
Digg this story Digg It!
Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us

Tags -  Micron

The jury in the antitrust case between Rambus and Micron has apparently reached a verdict. The decision hasn’t yet been posted on the U.S. District Court Web site, and Rambus hasn’t issued a statement.

But this afternoon Micron issued a press release objecting to the jury’s decision.

This case goes all the way back to 2000, and includes two other DRAM manufacturers besides Micron. Without being able to see the actual decision, it’s impossible to judge what its impact might be. But if Micron’s statement is any indication, it didn’t go well for them:

"Micron strongly believes that the evidence entered at the trial proves that Rambus violated antitrust laws and committed fraud, and Micron plans to appeal the outcome. Micron officials also believe that the jury’s decision is inconsistent with previous decisions by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the European Commission (EC). In August 2006, the FTC unanimously found that, through a course of illegal and deceptive conduct, Rambus was able to distort the critical standard-setting process of JEDEC and engaged in an anticompetitive 'hold up' of the computer memory industry. Similarly, in July 2007, the EC issued a Statement of Objections describing its views that Rambus engaged in intentional deceptive conduct in the standard-setting process or 'patent ambush' and violated EC law by subsequently claiming unreasonable royalties for the use of relevant patents."
UPDATE: Rambus has just issued a press release announcing the verdict.

6 Comments

  1. Micron is just a sour loser. AT RDRAM killing trial is coming up soon and Micron will certainly feel the pain if this case goes to trial and not settled.

    Comment By Mike Ming
    Wednesday, March 26, 2008 @ 10:31 PM

  2. I believe Rambus has made a business model out of lawsuits against others.... rather than building a real product. This is not good for any business or industry and I belive Rambus is in the wrong.

    Comment By opinion
    Thursday, March 27, 2008 @ 6:55 AM

  3. Rambus did not create a business model out of lawsuits against others.

    The Dram Mfgs. did this for them.

    If you don't want to pay the royaty, don't use the technology.

    Of course, its been a long long time and we are still waiting for that notification that a "work around" has been found.

    This has always been a no brainer. The truth just needed to come out

    Comment By Jack Lane
    Thursday, March 27, 2008 @ 7:27 AM

  4. Micron is getting what it deserves. Their actions have indicated that they can't complete on a level playing field, so they cheat (Cartel, IPT Theft, bribery, etc.). The records speak for themselves; I hope they all see jail time.

    Comment By D Bowie
    Thursday, March 27, 2008 @ 3:43 PM

  5. This is going to get real ugly for Micron based on what I've read. The company needs to settle with Rambus. The news is only going to get worst for Micron when an injunction is levied on their products. Idaho Business Journel needs to do some good investigative reporting on this story.

    Comment By Paul
    Saturday, March 29, 2008 @ 1:45 PM

  6. Monday morning stock action: Micron up strongly on high volume. The end of their independence (& maybe Idaho residency)?? Not good news for the T-Valley.

    Comment By Bill Sellers
    Monday, March 31, 2008 @ 9:57 AM

Leave a comment
Leave this field empty

Name:

Email:


You have characters left.

Commenters, let's maintain a civil discussion here. Please observe the following guidelines:

  1. Do not use profanity or euphemisms for profanity.
  2. Do not personally attack or bait other commenters.
  3. Express your own views; don't just argue for argument's sake.
  4. Sarcasm doesn't work on the Web. Either avoid it or clearly label it so you aren't misinterpreted.
  5. Don't make the same point repetitively.
  6. No spam. Link to a commercial site only if it's relevant to the discussion.
  7. Putting your name on your comments increases their value and credibility. However, if you must conceal your identity, please choose one pseudonym and stick to it. No "sock puppets."