Saturday, July 4, 2009 17:14 MDT
Idaho Business Review
subscribeSUBSCRIBE

subscribeWANT THREE FREE ISSUES?
Daily EmailDaily e-mail updates
Real Estate EmailReal Estate e-mail updates
ADVERTISING? | CLASSIFIEDS | GOT A TIP? | TOP LIST | EVENTS | HOME RSS 2.0 CONTACT US at 208.336.3768
SEARCH ARCHIVES
See stories on: Idaho Companies Idaho Industries Idaho People

idaho business news

Legislature may revise small-business incentive formula

POSTED: 15:31 MDT Tuesday, January 29, 2008

by Brad Carlson

Article Tools
Printer friendly edition Printer-friendly
E-mail this to a friend E-mail this
RSS Feed RSS feed
Digg this story Digg It!
Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us
Add to Facebook
Add to Twitter

Tags -  employment, Legislature, taxes

The House Revenue and Taxation Committee on Jan. 29 voted to print, for further discussion, a proposal to make the state’s Small Employer Incentive Act accessible to more businesses.

No companies have used the law, which the Idaho Legislature passed in 2005 in hopes of attracting highly paid jobs, Don Dietrich, Idaho Department of Commerce division administrator for economic, community and rural development, said in an interview.

The existing law requires small employers to invest $500,000 in new plant and facilities, and to create 10 new jobs paying at least $19.23 an hour. Such employers qualify for an investment tax credit of 3.75 percent instead of the standard 3 percent, a real property credit against income tax of 2.5 percent, and a new-jobs income tax credit.

“If a company hires more than 10 employees, the computation used to determine the average wage of new employees in excess of 10 is overly restrictive,” Dietrich said.

Now, the next 10 jobs must average $15.50 an hour. The formula counts all employees, but it only counts wages from $12 to $48.08; an employee earning less than $12 must be offset by someone earning $31 to reach the required $15.50 average.

Under the proposed change, every job below the $48.08 threshold could be added up and divided by the total number of employees, and the average must be at least $15.50. Dietrich said the change would not penalize companies for having support positions below $12 an hour, but it would prohibit companies from using people who earn more than $48.08 an hour to offset a large number of minimum-wage jobs.

For example, an employer could count individual employees earning $20, $18, $15 and $10 an hour – the total is $63 and the average is an incentive-qualifying $15.75. Now the $10 employee’s job is counted but the wage is not, so the four positions are divided into $53 for an average of $13.25.

Companies that looked to enter Idaho often commented on the problem with the existing formula, Dietrich said.

“If there is a tool in the toolbox that you can’t use, it’s kind of worthless to everyone,” he said. “What this does is open the door to more companies.”

Dietrich added: “We’re trying to get some smaller businesses in the game. This is part of our efforts to diversify, and our efforts in rural communities.”

4 Comments

  1. What is the bill number or the RS number?

    Comment By Calvin Leman
    Wednesday, January 30, 2008 @ 11:15 AM

  2. Today it has a bill number, committee Secretary Marsha Palmer said. It's H0431.

    Comment By Brad / IBR
    Wednesday, January 30, 2008 @ 11:45 AM

  3. What about the small service businesses like mine with 7 employees, all, except for one, paid above the threshold? My company is leasing a building I personally purchased. Adding the cost of the building and improvements made to "plant" we exceed the 500K threshold but are still under the 10 new employee limit.

    If no one is using the program obviously the Legislature answered a question that was not being asked. Is the purpose to get higher paying jobs or get companies to buy plant and facilities? Why the 10 employee limit? We intend to grow there, but not in 10 employee jumps. Why not give us really small businesses the help to grow? In my industry the average firm size is closer to 5-7.

    Comment By Patrick
    Wednesday, January 30, 2008 @ 11:46 AM

  4. Brad,

    Thank you for the bill number H431. I put it and a link to this article at http://fp1.centurytel.net/democracy/House_Rev_Tax_Comm.htm to help the people of District 35 participate in government. Lenore Hardy Barrett and JoAn Wood, our Representatives, are on the House Revenue and Taxation Committee.

    Comment By Calvin Leman
    Thursday, January 31, 2008 @ 2:56 PM

Leave a comment
Leave this field empty

Name:

Email:


You have characters left.

Commenters, let's maintain a civil discussion here. Please observe the following guidelines:

  1. Do not use profanity or euphemisms for profanity.
  2. Do not personally attack or bait other commenters.
  3. Express your own views; don't just argue for argument's sake.
  4. Sarcasm doesn't work on the Web. Either avoid it or clearly label it so you aren't misinterpreted.
  5. Don't make the same point repetitively.
  6. No spam. Link to a commercial site only if it's relevant to the discussion.
  7. Putting your name on your comments increases their value and credibility. However, if you must conceal your identity, please choose one pseudonym and stick to it. No "sock puppets."