Saturday, July 4, 2009 14:09 MDT
Idaho Business Review
subscribeSUBSCRIBE

subscribeWANT THREE FREE ISSUES?
Daily EmailDaily e-mail updates
Real Estate EmailReal Estate e-mail updates
ADVERTISING? | CLASSIFIEDS | GOT A TIP? | TOP LIST | EVENTS | HOME RSS 2.0 CONTACT US at 208.336.3768
SEARCH ARCHIVES
See stories on: Idaho Companies Idaho Industries Idaho People

idaho business news

Chambers to stay busy at Legislature

POSTED: 09:35 MDT Thursday, December 20, 2007

by Brad Carlson

Article Tools
Printer friendly edition Printer-friendly
E-mail this to a friend E-mail this
RSS Feed RSS feed
Digg this story Digg It!
Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us
Add to Facebook
Add to Twitter

Tags -  Boise Chamber, Idaho Chamber Alliance

Chambers of commerce in the Treasure Valley and around Idaho agree with many priorities set in the new Boise Metro Chamber of Commerce 2008 Legislative Agenda. But some have additional priorities, officials said at a joint chamber legislative breakfast Dec. 20 in Meridian.

For example, the Gem County and Eagle chambers will support creating an Idaho 16 interchange with Interstate 84; Nampa and Caldwell chambers will promote agri-business issues; and the Meridian chamber supports retaining existing sales and use tax exemptions. Meridian also supports clarifying the “ordinary and necessary expenditures” clause in Article 8, Section 3 of the Idaho Constitution regarding borrowing.

John Watts of the Idaho Chamber Alliance said that in north Idaho, the top issue among chambers is workforce development, followed by water supply and transportation. In eastern Idaho, the top issue is repeal of the personal property tax on businesses, followed by urban renewal and transportation.

Magic Valley chambers have workforce development as the top priority, followed by urban renewal and transportation, he said. Transportation tops the list in the Treasure Valley, followed by urban renewal and expansion of local-option taxing authority.

2 Comments

  1. Idaho Chambers should really consider home-rule powers for all Idaho towns & cities above a certain population size. As we are the ONLY western state without it, that constitutionally-protected doctrine alone would given them ALL the tools they need to get things done.

    Comment By Bill Sellers Idaho Falls
    Thursday, December 20, 2007 @ 1:10 PM

  2. Bill,

    It must be wonderful knowing that all of the issues above can be solved with a single solution. Let's see, it seems like the local school boards/districts have had that ability for years and it sure seems like they have done a real bangup job. Why else would they sue the state.

    Comment By rick
    Monday, December 24, 2007 @ 8:24 PM

Leave a comment
Leave this field empty

Name:

Email:


You have characters left.

Commenters, let's maintain a civil discussion here. Please observe the following guidelines:

  1. Do not use profanity or euphemisms for profanity.
  2. Do not personally attack or bait other commenters.
  3. Express your own views; don't just argue for argument's sake.
  4. Sarcasm doesn't work on the Web. Either avoid it or clearly label it so you aren't misinterpreted.
  5. Don't make the same point repetitively.
  6. No spam. Link to a commercial site only if it's relevant to the discussion.
  7. Putting your name on your comments increases their value and credibility. However, if you must conceal your identity, please choose one pseudonym and stick to it. No "sock puppets."